[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP
From: |
David Figueroa |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 01:34:54 -0000 |
I also want to put my vote for a very small
group with write access. Let Adam select from people he trusts. This is a
TREMENDOUS responsability, not to be taken lightly.
I also vote to keep the lwip development
focused on the "light weight" premise on which it was created. Maybe the
gig eth should be a different cvs module that uses parts of the core?
I agree with Paul, that at this point lwip
is not robust enough for serious use. I am know having problems with
multiple connections that I am trying to isolate.
Thanks all for your hard work.
dave
----- Original Message -----
Hello,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duncan Palmer"
<address@hidden>
> access. These guys should have worked on a
number of different parts of
the
> stack (not just writing drivers for
example). Everyone else will have to
> submit their changes to the list as per
usual for peer review, and one of
the
> 2 or 3 people with write access will check
in the changes if they, and the
> list think they're ok. It is very
important that these people with write
> access know enough about most of the stack
to be able to effectively
evaluate
> all changes!
>
This seems like a good idea. Use the mailing
list to issue problems and
features,
and then after much reviewing forward the
changes into the current tree.
> Based on what I've seen on the list, my
nominees for people with write
access
> would be Leon, Kieran and Paul.
>
Thanks for your trust. I am not familiar
with the TCP part of the stack
though;
the rest has become rather familiar with me.
I think Paul has a major point in the
complexness of the dynamic memory
management
issues, especially regarding the TCP part of
the code, and the resulting
flakiness.
However, I think this is the best available
open-source TCP/IP project I
have seen, so
it's definately worth every effort to make
it rock stable.
Leon.
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP, Duncan Palmer, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP, David Figueroa, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP, Duncan Palmer, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP, Duncan Palmer, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP,
David Figueroa <=
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP, Duncan Palmer, 2003/01/09