[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving
From: |
K.J. Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving |
Date: |
08 Oct 2004 13:55:47 +0100 |
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:35, Atte Kojo wrote:
> This is because tcp_recved() only does an ack if there are no acks
> pending (delayed or otherwise):
Well spotted.
> if (!(pcb->flags & TF_ACK_DELAY) &&
> !(pcb->flags & TF_ACK_NOW)) {
> /* ... comment deleted ... */
> tcp_ack(pcb);
> }
>
> This effectively nullifies the tests in tcp_ack() in this case.
That needs changing: any objections to me removing those checks in
tcp_receive()?
Kieran
- [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/08
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/08
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/10
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/12