[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveon a s
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveon a single port |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:16:18 +0000 |
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 12:12 +0000, Julian Gardner [RSD] wrote:
> and 5 tasks? dont want to stop the main code running.
That would work, or use select() (if the lwIP implementation is up to
it) or use non-blocking reads (again, not sure if our implementation of
sockets is complete enough) and poll the sockets.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send and receive on a single port, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2008/01/21
- Re: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send and receive on a single port, Kieran Mansley, 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send andreceive on a single port, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send andreceive on a single port, Kieran Mansley, 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceive on a single port, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceive on a single port, Kieran Mansley, 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveon a single port, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveon a single port,
Kieran Mansley <=
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveona single port, Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE), 2008/01/23
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceive on a single port, Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE), 2008/01/23