[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] ip_reass
From: |
Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE) |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] ip_reass |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:26:57 -0400 |
I'm running a late 1.2 baseline, and have used ip_reass extensively. I
haven't seen any issues, but my network is pretty well behaved so I
probably have not experienced many corner cases.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
On
> Behalf Of Ed Sutter
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 5:56 PM
> To: lwip users
> Subject: [lwip-users] ip_reass
>
> Hey folks,,
> I'm using 1.3.0, been running fine for quite a while now.
> I just crashed somewhere in ip_reass() as a result of an
> incoming IP fragment (MF bit set in header). Are there any
> known problems with IP_REASSEMBLY in lwip1.3.0?
> Thanks
> Ed
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
- R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, (continued)
- R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ceresoli Luca, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Kieran Mansley, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, address@hidden, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Kieran Mansley, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/11
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Simon Goldschmidt, 2008/10/11
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass, address@hidden, 2008/10/17
- R: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ceresoli Luca, 2008/10/10
RE: [lwip-users] ip_reass,
Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE) <=
Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass, urs . gerber, 2008/10/08
Re: Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass, urs . gerber, 2008/10/09