lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [lwip-users] Re: tx badnwidth


From: Kieran Mansley
Subject: Re: Re: [lwip-users] Re: tx badnwidth
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:37:55 +0000

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 08:11 -0500, Chen wrote:

> /* TCP receive window. */
> #define TCP_WND                 1500
> 
> /* TCP sender buffer space (bytes). */
> #define TCP_SND_BUF             2150

The above two settings are much too small to expect decent throughput,
and almost certainly explain the poor performance in the 2048-byte-write
capture you sent.  You can probably get away with leaving TCP_WND alone
if you're acting purely as a sender of packets, but TCP_SND_BUF should
be as large as you can make it.

Kieran





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]