Re: [lwip-users] Re: tx badnwidth

[address@hidden]

Kieran Mansley wrote:
> You can probably get away with leaving TCP_WND alone
> if you're acting purely as a sender of packets,
In fact, I think you won't, as TCP_WND is not only the announced receive 
window size but serves as a limit for transmit window, too.

Regarding memory size, the PBUF_POOL should not be that relevant since 
it is only used for RX. TX uses the pool. You could try to set it bigger 
than the 3KBytes you currently have it set to.

Simon