[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions
From: |
Bill Auerbach |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:45:58 -0400 |
>-----Original Message-----
>From: address@hidden
>[mailto:address@hidden On
>Behalf Of address@hidden
>Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:10 PM
>To: Mailing list for lwIP users
>Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions
>
>Bill Auerbach schrieb:
>> I'm being pushy because for me this packing
>> was one of 3 performance killers.
>3? What are the other 2? (Except for the TCP macros I recently checked
>in)
TCP macro changes, not packing ip_addr, and using packing of 2, not 1 in the
packing #includes/#defines.
Bill
- Re: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions, (continued)
- RE: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions, Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/25
- RE: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions, Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/25
- RE: [lwip-users] IP Address Display Functions, Kieran Mansley, 2009/08/25
- [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, Jakob Stoklund Olesen, 2009/08/25
- RE: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, Bill Auerbach, 2009/08/25
- Re: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, address@hidden, 2009/08/25
- Re: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions, address@hidden, 2009/08/25
- RE: [lwip-users] Re: IP Address Display Functions,
Bill Auerbach <=
Re: [lwip-users] Possible deadlock in LWIP 1.3.1 RC1, Eran Rundstein, 2009/08/24
Re: [lwip-users] Possible deadlock in LWIP 1.3.1 RC1, address@hidden, 2009/08/24