[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 1998 07:24:29 -0500 (EST) |
>
> > ANything that can make lynx interpret ^[[154q as PGUP (and the rest of
> > the funky codes) would be most welcome, by me at least!
>
> My workaround (only partially successful because not all keys can be
> remapped) was based on my DOS telnet application being able to accept
> definitions for keys. In the "old-days" I had to send the code sequence
> "ESC O P 1 CR", and I mapped this and 7 others to pf13-20. At least
> check to see if your terminal emulator will accept a new definition for
> PGUP, i.e., accept ^[[154q, but send a replacement code 0x105 to the host.
btw - I'm a little puzzled: a SVr4 curses implementation with a correctly
constructed terminfo should at least recognize the control sequences (and
not echo the sequence, as described earlier). Whether the application
accepts that key or not is a different matter.
(BSD curses implementations may/may not have next-page/prev-page in their
repertoire).
> __Henry
>
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, John E. Davis, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, John E. Davis, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, John E. Davis, 1998/02/26
- RE: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, Eric Anderson, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, John E. Davis, 1998/02/26
- RE: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV LYNX low level key mapping - Problems,
T.E.Dickey <=