lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev suggested addition to lynx.cfg


From: Klaus Weide
Subject: Re: lynx-dev suggested addition to lynx.cfg
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:17:35 -0500 (CDT)

On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > I suggest the following be added at the end of lynx.cfg:
> > > > > > [ ... ] <-- text here
> > > > > > #INCLUDE:~/.lynx.cfg
> >      -----
> > I wrote earlier that I don't care about what the suggested filename is,
> > but now I think that "~/.lynx.cfg" can still invite people to make bad
> > assumptions - the name encourages users to just copy the system-wide
> > /etc/lynx.cfg or /usr/local/lib/lynx.cfg to their home directory and
> > then change only what they want to change in that copy.  That will
> > fail at least for the "INCLUDE" itself, if the user doesns't remove
> > it... (I havent' checked how the code deals with such a loop).
> 
>  lynx has a maximal allowed inclusion level (as I remember - 10).
> 
> > So the name should indicate that the file is 'included' by something
> > else.  I suggest .lynx.cfg-inc, maybe someone has a better idea?
> 
>  May be more explicit: .lynx.cfg-override?

So far I prefer -inc vs. -override:
1. It's shorter.
2. It doesn't override all of lynx.cfg (which one might assume based on
   the name), and it doesn't override all settings (e.g. PRINTER would
   add to the list).

Anyone else? :)

  Klaus


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]