[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GMG-Devel] December 3rd, our monthly IRC meeting!

From: Christopher Allan Webber
Subject: Re: [GMG-Devel] December 3rd, our monthly IRC meeting!
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 08:55:07 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)

First of all, these look like great things to discuss, so we should
discuss them!

Second of all, I goofed and forgot that "16:00 UTC" changes when
daylight savings changes, which means that this is now an hour earlier,
and 8AM for our hackers in California.  Not cool :(

What we're going to do is see if anyone who shows up to the meeting
minds if we push it back one hour.  If not, we'll push this forward to
17:00 UTC.  If people do mind, we'll just go forward and have an
extended session.

Sorry about the trouble!

Jef van Schendel <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all!
> Two more small items I'd like to discuss...
> - Ticket #466 "Use of "Submit" in site copy is sterile and not as
> friendly and welcoming as it could be". I'd really like to change this
> soon to something more suitable. How can we improve the wording here?
> Some alternatives have been mentioned in the bug report, but which one
> should we pick? Link:
> - The concept and naming of "favourites". We'll (hopefully) be able to
> "favourite" media soon, which I *think* means that 1) it'll work like
> a "I like this" comment, a quick token of appreciation, 2) it'll be
> added to your list of favourites so you can save and promote it, and
> 3) we could maybe use the number of favourites as a ranking. What I'd
> like to know is: is that the intended purpose? If so, should we name
> them favo(u)rites or something else? "Like", "love", "save",
> "appreciate", "heart", "high five" and many more could all be
> contenders. And the name should be consistent with the action and
> purpose, of course. So I'd like to clear up how and why we will use
> favourites and what we should call them.
> Jef
> 2011/12/1 Deborah Nicholson <address@hidden>:
>> Hi all,
>> We're having our monthly meeting this Saturday, December 3rd at 16:00 UTC.
>> This meeting is a little before the 0.2.0 release but we'll still be mostly
>> talking about the next release.
>> Preliminary Agenda (in progress):
>> We plan to create a plugin system. Do we want to create that soon or push it
>> off until things settle a bit more? (Willkg 08:54, 10 November 2011 (EST))
>> Feature Ideas: What should we do about the wiki page? Keep it and have it as
>> a monthly topic for "what next"? Convert everything to long waiting bugs?
>> Possibility of an SQL Database Backend? 'executive summary' (well, you
>> should read the long docs): "We could move to sql. It's probably replacing
>> one type of pain by another type of pain, but those are somewhat comparable.
>> Leaving the main question: Do we want to occupy our main devs for some long
>> time with this task and loose momentum?"
>> Schendje's activities proposal
>> Add or embellish agenda items here:
>> See you Saturday,
>> Deb
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]