[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] dumb servers
From: |
Zbynek Winkler |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] dumb servers |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:29:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 |
graydon hoare wrote:
About NNTP, email, "dumb web" distribution - all you have to do is
record, for each block whether or not it was sent to a specific
destination.
no, I think I'd just remove these things altogether, let people sync
between databases directly as the primary mode of operation.
I like the option to have a "mirror" of the my database somewhere on the
server accessible to anyone at any time and when the server does not
have to be smart it extends my choice of servers. How would this work if
you would have removed the these things? Suppose you have two people
working on a project that are rarely online at the same time... Do you
propose to sync the two databases each of them have on the workstations?
While thinking more about this - depot.cgi could function as a subset of
monotone knowing only how to sync databases. Is this what you meant? If
it also knew how to recreate the files from the database it could
function as 'viewcvs' to browse the code online (which is not possible
now as I understand it because in the depot database is only a bunch of
packets).
Zbynek
--
http://zw.matfyz.cz/ http://robotika.cz/
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- [Monotone-devel] dumb servers,
Zbynek Winkler <=