monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Curious about ikiwiki integration


From: Brian May
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Curious about ikiwiki integration
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:11:10 +1100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux)

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Levitte <- VMS Whacker <address@hidden>> writes:

    Richard> Well, one thing that's a bit hard is how to handle
    Richard> conflicts in monotone terms.  The new
    Richard> merge_into_workspace helps, I'll say.  I need to make
    Richard> some experiments to see how I can back out of such a
    Richard> merge, though.

Thats one issue I was wondering about...

I am not sure what merge_into_workspace is, I guess I haven't been
keeping up-to-date...

There are several scenarios for conflicts I can think of:

1. Somebody alters the local working directory used by the server
without committing it. Shouldn't happen, perhaps we can just generate
an error?

2. Two people commit a change from the same server at the same time,
resulting in two heads.

3. One/more people push updates that include multiple heads.

For the initial revision I guess I would be happy if it just tries to
do an "mtn update" and fails if there are multiple heads or local
conflict - this might be confusing though unless it is obvious that
the update failed.

    Richard> Eeeep, I didn't pay attention at that time.  If anyone
    Richard> could point me at that message, or give me a hint at how
    Richard> to fid it (subject line, for example), I'd be greatful!

Some here. I meant to keep a copy... I knew it was important at the
time... 

Arhh, here is the start of the thread:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/monotone-devel/2006-10/msg00068.html

some of these posts might be worth reading again, even if you read them before.

The message I was referring to is:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/monotone-devel/2006-10/msg00080.html
-- 
Brian May <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]