|
From: | Marco Roos |
Subject: | Re: [Myexperiment-discuss] Characteristics of workflows |
Date: | Fri, 15 May 2009 14:00:12 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Hello all, I agree with Andrea's suggestions. The obvious is already on the list, isn't it? I.e. title and descriptions of the workflow, subworkflows, processors, and in a sense anything that users add as annotation on myExperiment or BioCatalogue for the services used. Scott and I have given Carole and Jits some feedback at the SWAT4LS meeting on this topic. One of the important distinctions that we made was between what to search on and what to rank on. Have you made that distinction in this discussion too? Search can be less restrictive (e.g. lenient towards false positives) if you have powerful ranking mechanisms (e.g. user chooses what to sort on). Edgar: would you have additional tips? (Edgar is a PhD student in the field of information retrieval.) Cheers, Marco. Paul Fisher wrote: There is also the feedback Werner Muller has from his experiences. --
Marco Roos Adaptive Information Disclosure Faculty of Science University of Amsterdam Kruislaan 403, room N2.30 1098 SJ Amsterdam tel. +31 (0) 20 525 7522 Communities: Professional: LinkedIn, myExperiment and address@hidden groups on facebook Personal: Hyves |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |