[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Lack of source for cygwin1.dll in windows version of na
From: |
Christopher Faylor |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Lack of source for cygwin1.dll in windows version of nano |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:15:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 04:52:33AM -0700, Chris Allegretta wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:30:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> A cygwin mailing list user indicated that you were providing a copy
>> of cygwin1.dll in your windows distribution of nano, so I thought I'd
>> check out your site to see what was up. I may be missing something but
>> I don't see the source code for the cygwin DLL located anywhere on
>> your site.
>
>Hello Christopher,
>
> No, you are correct, my apologies. I have copied the file
>cygwin-1.3.19-1-src.tar.bz2 to the NT/ subdirectory of the nano
>distribution, I am using a fairly old installation of cygwin so I
>imagine this should be the correct version. Unfortunately I have no
>electricity at home right now so I can't check for certain. If this does
>not satisfy the requirements please let me know. Ironic that a GNU
>package would itself be violating the GPL...
:-)
> The win32 package you mentioned was created for people who
>didn't want to have the entire cygwin distribution installed in order to
>use nano; for the same reason the nano binary uses PDcurses rather than
>ncurses so no termcap files are needed. I think the cygwin provided
>version of nano is far superior as things like spell check would
>actually work, but I think the standalone win32 package is still
>useful, just to a different audience.
Ok. Makes sense.
>Anyway, my apologies again and have a good day.
No apologies necessary. It is actually great for me to bring this to
someone's attention and get such a reasonable response. Much appreciated.
cgf