Re: [Nano-devel] 1.2.1?

[Wouter Van Hemel]

On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:

> --- Wouter Van Hemel <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >This test does not fail (or segfault).
>
> Since I don't have access to a system using glibc 2.2.3, I had to rely
> on the info DB provided about the crash's occurring on blank lines.
> Apparently I didn't get it right; sorry about that.  However, I've

Well, the BROKEN_REGEXEC patch works, so it's really not a problem to me.

> looked at the backtrace in the mailing list archives again, and noted
> that the blank line is accessed via the address operator, which might
> have something to do with it.  Does the attached program segfault on
> your system?
>

No, it doesn't. Feel free to send me other tests or patches, if you have
other ideas...


Regards,

  wouter