Re: [Nano-devel] 1.2.1?

[Wouter Van Hemel]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:

> After going through the glibc mailing list archives from around the time
> of 2.2.3-2.2.4, the closest thing to this bug appears to be the problem
> described at:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-06/msg00015.html
>
> I've modified the (attached) test program to try and trigger this, and
> if I got it right, it should segfault on your system.  Let me know if it
> does.  Thanks in advance.
>
>

Yup, we have a winner.

# ./test
Segmentation fault

...

(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/wouter/./test

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x400d7f17 in re_match_2_internal (bufp=0xbffff820, cstring1=0x0,
csize1=0,
    cstring2=0x8048513 "", csize2=0, pos=0, regs=0xbffff840, stop=0)
    at regex.c:7089
7089    regex.c: No such file or directory.
        in regex.c
(gdb) bt
[...]

Same location as the nano crash.
(gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.2.3)


Regards,

  wouter