[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] GNU nano 2.3.2
|
From: |
Kamil Dudka |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] GNU nano 2.3.2 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:54:01 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Friday 22 March 2013 20:35:42 Chris Allegretta wrote:
> Ok, I have created a new 2.3.2 tarball with a proper version of
> automake. You can download the current tarball, and for posterity it
> should have the following signature:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEABECAAYFAlFMZm4ACgkQvLNW35EAn6fxZwCfRInqm1BBuoCn1LK9/EnZM8ZD
> h84AoMjOwn4eXf7RpAViOdiVFFjsLXsD
> =3TFt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I have downloaded <http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/v2.3/nano-2.3.2.tar.gz>
and attempted to verify the signature:
$ gpg --verify nano-2.3.2.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Fri 22 Mar 2013 03:10:54 PM CET using DSA key ID 91009FA7
gpg: BAD signature from "Chris Allegretta <address@hidden>"
Do I have a wrong tarball or a wrong signature?
$ sha1sum nano-2.3.2.tar.gz
5d4bed4f15088fc3cba0650a89bd343b061f456d nano-2.3.2.tar.gz
Kamil