Re: [Nano-devel] GNU nano 2.3.2

[Chris Allegretta]

Wrong signature, and thank you for verifying.  When I encountered the
automake bug looks like I didnt regenerate the ascii signature.  It
should be:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlFRsnwACgkQvLNW35EAn6f9wwCdHmY/WKtwVoLR49vPgr/D8mwN
ULcAn0nHgbd3m7B5XKaWrF5hJkypsss/
=ZC4W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

and should be updated on the website.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Kamil Dudka <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Friday 22 March 2013 20:35:42 Chris Allegretta wrote:
>> Ok, I have created a new 2.3.2 tarball with a proper version of
>> automake.  You can download the current tarball, and for posterity it
>> should have the following signature:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEABECAAYFAlFMZm4ACgkQvLNW35EAn6fxZwCfRInqm1BBuoCn1LK9/EnZM8ZD
>> h84AoMjOwn4eXf7RpAViOdiVFFjsLXsD
>> =3TFt
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> I have downloaded <http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/v2.3/nano-2.3.2.tar.gz>
> and attempted to verify the signature:
>
> $ gpg --verify nano-2.3.2.tar.gz.asc
> gpg: Signature made Fri 22 Mar 2013 03:10:54 PM CET using DSA key ID 91009FA7
> gpg: BAD signature from "Chris Allegretta <address@hidden>"
>
> Do I have a wrong tarball or a wrong signature?
>
> $ sha1sum nano-2.3.2.tar.gz
> 5d4bed4f15088fc3cba0650a89bd343b061f456d  nano-2.3.2.tar.gz
>
> Kamil