[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] streamlining a bit of syntax coloring
From: |
Rishabh Dave |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] streamlining a bit of syntax coloring |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jul 2016 19:37:06 +0530 |
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Benno Schulenberg
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016, at 16:49, Rishabh Dave wrote:
>> and it is initialized as soon as pairnum is
>> initialized (change in color.c)
>
> Okay. Functionality is good. When you've fixed the above,
> send a signed-off patch -- which would be best to do always,
> because the commit message is an essential part of a change.
Signed patch is attached. It was kind of difficult to write commit
message mostly due to my understanding of the changes.
I am curious regarding the addition of a variable to colortype: can't
we replace the instances of variable attributes by the expression
initializing attributes; i.e. -
wattron(edit, (bright) ? (COLOR_PAIR(varnish->pairnum) | A_BOLD) :
COLOR_PAIR(pairnum));
wattroff(edit, (bright) ? (COLOR_PAIR(varnish->pairnum) | A_BOLD)
: COLOR_PAIR(pairnum));
I know it is now just previous block of statements wrapped into a too
long statement but it would save a variable which we use only a couple
of times (learnt form you :) ). That is until... we are looking
forward to use it heavily.
0001-tweaks-add-new-variable-for-streamlining-the-code.patch
Description: Text Data