[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano respond to a SIGCONT?
|
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano respond to a SIGCONT? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2017 12:48:49 +0200 |
On Thu, May 25, 2017, at 12:05, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> So in effect it should ignore any SIGCONT that doesn't come
> from the fg command. Which is what the attached patch does.
The body of do_continue() was just for testing purposes.
Attached is a version of the patch that will make nano
recompute also the size of the edit window.
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Access your email from home and the web
handle-sigcont-as-sigwinch.patch
Description: Text Data