[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] how should piping through an external command work?
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] how should piping through an external command work? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:24:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
Op 18-02-18 om 14:42 schreef Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
> I have an Idea: if the first character of a command is a '|' (and
> there is no text selected), nano should pipe the whole buffer to the
> command. This is not very discoverable but would allow us to have both
> possibilities without the need of new toggle.
Not bad. But, as you say, this is not discoverable, and that is not
nano's style. Nano's style is to show in the help lines the things
that are possible.
Benno
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Nano-devel] how should piping through an external command work?, Benno Schulenberg, 2018/02/18
Re: [Nano-devel] how should piping through an external command work?, Brand Huntsman, 2018/02/18
Re: [Nano-devel] how should piping through an external command work?, Benno Schulenberg, 2018/02/19
[Nano-devel] Fwd: Re: how should piping through an external command work?, Benno Schulenberg, 2018/02/19
Re: [Nano-devel] Fwd: Re: how should piping through an external command work?, Brand Huntsman, 2018/02/19
Re: [Nano-devel] Fwd: Re: how should piping through an external command work?, Benno Schulenberg, 2018/02/20