[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?
From: |
Peter Galbraith |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option? |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:27:42 -0500 |
Jon Steinhart <address@hidden> wrote:
> If you decide to make these additions, keep in mind that they have to
> be done in the send code, not in the whatnow code. This is because
> the design of the attachment code was such that it would work
> independent of the user interface. In particular, I know people who
> have hacked mh-e to add attachment headers.
I'm sure Bill will chime-in here... MH-E now can use either mhn
attachment directives, or gnus directives. The Content-Type is (for the
most part) filled-in automatically using `file -i'.
Peter
- Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?, David Levine, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?, David Levine, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?, David Levine, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?, David Levine, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?, David Levine, 2006/01/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?, David Levine, 2006/01/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] suppress Content-ID's with new mhbuild option?, David Levine, 2006/01/31