[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage
From: |
Earl Hood |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:27:17 -0600 |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:
> Frankly, people who run tmp cleaners that are that braindead probably
> deserve what they get.
Are we to worry about braindead temp cleaners? I.e. I'm
sure other apps would have problems with braindead
cleaners, so should we waste resources dealing with
a problem that is not worth addressing?
> Regardless, moving them to a configurable tmp
> location is not a bad idea -- but I don't want to hit my NFS mounted
> home dir every time I make a tmp file. So I'd make /var/tmp/<user> or
> /tmp/<user> and point to that.
I'm unsure if real-time performance is super critical
with nmh. If going with /var/tmp/<user>, you still
do not completely avoid braindead cleaners since you are
still working under the system tmp directory.
--ewh
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, (continued)
[Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
[Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Peter Maydell, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Sean Kamath, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage,
Earl Hood <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Sean Kamath, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Chad Brown, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Earl Hood, 2010/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: Diffs for replacing mktemp() usage, Chad Brown, 2010/02/04