Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh

[norm]

Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:

>
>4) In terms of alternate mail stores, be they Maildir or IMAP (I think
>those are the two major candidates now, right?), I think those ideas
>are interesting.  The #1 problem with those ideas is how to map MH
>message numbers (which can range 1-MAXINT, with holes) to the internal
>key used by those mail stores; everything else is relatively easy
>to deal with.

I can't quite tell if by "alternate", you meant optional. I certainly hope
so.