Re: questions about the Previous-Sequence

[Philipp]

[2020-03-22 14:58] Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden>
> > 1. in the shell using the same messages again and spare some typing
> ...
> > The first completely covered with the shell history.
>
> If the arguments given to the last nmh command don't have a side effect
> then shell history may be useful, but
>
>     show next:3
>     scan !$
>
> doesn't achieve the same as Previous-Sequence.
>
> Not arguing you shouldn't remove it, just spotting a case you may not
> have considered.

Yes we have overseen this case, thanks.

Philipp