Re: Bug reported regarding Unicode handling in email address

[Valdis Klētnieks]

On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:04:36 +0100, Ralph Corderoy said:

> What sorry excuse for an MUA are you using over there?  :-)

That would be exmh.

> And why doesn't it complain at you when it spots the attempt to send
> these transgressions onto the wire?

That's a very good question - I *thought* I fixed that, but obviously
there's still some unicode/utf-8 confusion. It displayed correctly in Ken's
mail, while composing the reply, and in your mail, which is why I didn't
notice it was still broken.

But wait.. there's more..  The =AF=5C screw-up is in the outbound file.

17:38:01 0 [~] grep "can only say" Mail/outbox/41541 | hx
00000000 3E206361 6E206F6E 6C792073 6179203D  41463D35 435F28E3 8384295F 
2F3D4146  *> can only say =AF=5C_(...)_/=AF*
00000020 2E0A

But linemode 'show' displays it correctly as well. Why did *that* work here
but you report 

> it doesn't display correctly here when decoded, e.g. the un-QP'd =AF
> isn't valid UTF=8.

nmh-dafuq.png
Description: nmh-dafuq.png