[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:10:41 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:79.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/79.0 |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #58926 (project octave):
BTW, independent of the BLAS and OMP question, you can speed up the rest of
your code with vectorization:
octave:21> clear a b c d
octave:22> tic; for a = 1:500, for b = 1:500, c(a,b) = sin(a + b^2); endfor;
endfor; toc
Elapsed time is 0.85335 seconds.
octave:23> tic; d = sin((1:500)' + (1:500).^2); toc
Elapsed time is 0.00294185 seconds.
octave:24> assert(all(all(c==d)))
octave:25>
It's roughly 290 times faster to avoid the for-loops in this case (853 ms vs 3
ms).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58926>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, anonymous, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, anonymous, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, anonymous, 2020/08/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices,
anonymous <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, anonymous, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Archisman Panigrahi, 2020/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2020/08/11