[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-

**From**: |
anonymous |

**Subject**: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices |

**Date**: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:10:41 -0400 (EDT) |

**User-agent**: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:79.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/79.0 |

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #58926 (project octave):
BTW, independent of the BLAS and OMP question, you can speed up the rest of
your code with vectorization:
octave:21> clear a b c d
octave:22> tic; for a = 1:500, for b = 1:500, c(a,b) = sin(a + b^2); endfor;
endfor; toc
Elapsed time is 0.85335 seconds.
octave:23> tic; d = sin((1:500)' + (1:500).^2); toc
Elapsed time is 0.00294185 seconds.
octave:24> assert(all(all(c==d)))
octave:25>
It's roughly 290 times faster to avoid the for-loops in this case (853 ms vs 3
ms).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58926>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Archisman Panigrahi*, `2020/08/10`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Archisman Panigrahi*, `2020/08/10`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Archisman Panigrahi*, `2020/08/10`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *anonymous*, `2020/08/10`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *anonymous*, `2020/08/10`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Archisman Panigrahi*, `2020/08/10`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *anonymous*, `2020/08/10`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**,
*anonymous* **<=**
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Kai Torben Ohlhus*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Archisman Panigrahi*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Archisman Panigrahi*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Kai Torben Ohlhus*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Kai Torben Ohlhus*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Archisman Panigrahi*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *anonymous*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Dmitri A. Sergatskov*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Archisman Panigrahi*, `2020/08/11`
**[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices**, *Dmitri A. Sergatskov*, `2020/08/11`