[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: f2c obsolete?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: f2c obsolete? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:03:01 +0200 |
On 10/23/07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 23-Oct-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
> | Yes. This will break compilation under MSVC, which relies on f2c.
>
> Why would it break compilation using f2c if there were a wrapper
> script for f2c+$CC that acted as a compiler?
If you provide an equivalent pseudo fortran compiler, then I guess
it would be OK. Although I'm pretty sure other problems will pop
up :-)
Michael.
- f2c obsolete?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/23
- Re: f2c obsolete?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/23
- Re: f2c obsolete?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/23
- Re: f2c obsolete?,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: f2c obsolete?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, Thomas Treichl, 2007/10/24
- Re: f2c obsolete?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/24