|
From: | Doug Stewart |
Subject: | Re: change to residue.m |
Date: | Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:59:33 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) |
Ben Abbott wrote:
Doug Stewart and I invested some time and effort improving the accuracy of the residue.m script when pole multiplicity exists.I don't see any response to this Email from Dec 24th on the maintainers list. Did it get implemented?Doug's suggestion, which we've each invested several hours testing, was to set the value of each unique pole to that average of the multiple poles associated with it. The result has been found to be a few orders of magnitude more accurate.To capture the improvement, the test scripts were also modified to be more stringent.In the event, for those interested in verifying our work, I've attached the patch and ChangeLog.Ben
Doug Stewart
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |