octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OctDev] moving Octave Forge mailing list to core's mailman server


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Re: [OctDev] moving Octave Forge mailing list to core's mailman server
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:40:41 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16

On 11/23/2012 02:26 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
On 23 November 2012 19:46, Olaf Till<address@hidden>  wrote:
I'd call it address@hidden, so it is clearer what is meant.
Also, 'forge' relates to SourceForge, doesn't it? And who can be sure
that the package repository will stick to SourceForge forever.

On 23 November 2012 20:00, Daniel J Sebald<address@hidden>  wrote:
Wasn't there some discussion about changing the name "forge" because of
confusion with SourceForge?

What about Agora?  Should that have it's own mail list?

Yes there was a discussion at OctConf and we agreed to keep the name
Forge. Agora would have 3 sections, one of them named forge for Octave
Forge. It's likely that Forge came from being hosted at Sourceforge,
but if we move out we can still keep that part of the name.

I don't think that packages is a name representative of what the
mailing list is meant for. There are other packages not part of Octave
Forge. And this will be specially true if Agora works and many people
upload their own packages (who will not be part of Octave Forge). Such
name would suggest that we are developing them and giving them
support. We will not. For such cases, users should contact the Agora
package author directly. That is also the reason why Agora should not
have its own mailing list. If one compares Agora to FileExchange, it
does not make sense to have everyone that ever submitted code to
FileExchange on a mailing list in case a user has a question for one
of them.

OK, makes sense. May want to note that in the Agora documentation, that much of it is not community supported, but individually supported.


On 23 November 2012 19:46, Olaf Till<address@hidden>  wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 07:17:40PM +0100, Carnë Draug wrote:
* some e-mails are sent for more than one mailing list. If the same
mailman server is handling them, this should prevent people from
receiving 2 e-mails with the same subject.

Really? It does not seem to be so with octave-help and
octave-maintainers now.

Oh! I thought mailman was smarter than that. It may be gmail that is
fusing the 2 e-mails together, I assumed it was mailman doing.

On 23 November 2012 20:00, Daniel J Sebald<address@hidden>  wrote:
How much activity does the help list get?

In what units?

I just searched the archives--wow that list gets a lot of activity, hundreds of posts per month. Can't really change that one.

Still "forge" I wonder about.  The term seems too broad and vague.

Dan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]