Re: very small packages - merge into general/miscelleneous or move into core

[c.]

On 14 Jan 2014, at 18:20, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 14 January 2014 16:12, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 16:20, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>>> Functions are grouped in packages based on a common subject.
>> 
>> The main question is grouped by whom?
> 
> By whoever is maintaining the package.
> 
>> Do you feel that you as the main maintainer of the OctaveForge website
>> are responsible of moving functions around and maintaining all the packages?
> 
> No. But the packages that I am the maintainer (image) and the ones who
> lack a maintainer yes.
> 
> Carnë

OK, I'm very glad we agree 100% on this part.

So if a package is useful and maintained, do 
you think we should care about how many functions 
it contains?

c.