|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | Re: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4 |
Date: | Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:37:53 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 |
On 03/11/2016 07:13 AM, JohnD wrote:
Message: 7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:24:13 -0800 From: Rik <address@hidden> To: Octave-Maintainers <address@hidden>, "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> Subject: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4 Message-ID: <address@hidden> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" jwe, I tested the new tarball at ftp://alpha.gnu.org. As expected for avanillaLinux system, it passed all tests and all build configurations including in-tree, out-of-tree builds, and 'make install' followed by__run_test_suite__.--RikCompiling in mxe-octave with new tarball and running win7: PASS 13020 FAIL 0 XFAIL 27 SKIPPED 54
I see almost the same result but I have 26 XFAIL and 13021 PASS. Here are my XFAIL counts:
libinterp\corefcn\conv2.cc-tst XFAIL 3 libinterp\corefcn\max.cc-tst XFAIL 3 general\num2str.m XFAIL 1 polynomial\residue.m XFAIL 1 testfun\speed.m XFAIL 1 testfun\test.m XFAIL 1 bug-38236.tst XFAIL 1 classdef.tst XFAIL 2 classes.tst XFAIL 11 jit.tst XFAIL 2 Which one(s) are different for you?Also, it's very nice to see that the packages are all cross compiled and installed by the installer now!
Uploading the nsis installer and the zip file distribution of the Windows binary to alpha.gnu.org now.
jwe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |