Re: GSoc 2016: Final Reviews required

[Juan Pablo Carbajal]

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 11:35 AM, PhilipNienhuis <address@hidden> wrote:
> JuanPi, how would  you like development to proceed further?
> Amr has finished his work but polishing the code for error checks etc. is
> still required. Such (input) error checks do not look very difficult and can
> be copied from other code in octave.
> The error catching (= avoiding crashes) is probably more challenging.

Hi,

I will keep apologizing for my lack of reaction.
I think the best is to merge with geometry asap (there is also APi
issues to solve) and continue fixing from there on.

I could make a bitbucket repo to ease the merging, or somebody with
push rights to SF could do it, if the time is pressing and you can't
wait for a window in my schedule.

Cheers