|
From: | Susi Lehtola |
Subject: | Re: naming scheme for the GSL package |
Date: | Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:07:08 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
On 10/18/2016 01:58 AM, Julien Bect wrote:
I know, but that is not the question. If people agree with me that full GSL names are better, I will deprecate the old function names but keep them around for some time (perhaps a very long time). By the way, backward compatibility aside, what is your opinion on this matter ?
I guess the consistency with gsl naming is a good argument, although I'm not totally sure if it's necessary to keep the whole "gsl_sf_" or if just "gsl_" would be better since it's shorter. But then again that wouldn't be very logical either, so I guess it's best to keep the original gsl function names.
-- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |