[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bioinfo package - maintenance of ...

From: Julien Bect
Subject: Re: bioinfo package - maintenance of ...
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:14:15 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0

Le 18/12/2017 à 22:03, Doug Stewart a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Olaf Till <address@hidden> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:33:44AM -0500, Doug Stewart wrote:
> I still think we need a 3 tier setup
> 1) pkgs like control statistics etc that should have strict rules
> 2) pkgs like this that allows the maintainer more freedom.
> 3) pkgs that we only link to and the maintainer has full control over.

Currently we have a 2 tier setup.

1) As your 1), but seemingly you have different criteria to choose
   packages to include.

2) roughly as your 2), maintainer has full control except that certain
   rules have to be met. These rules don't include the coding style.

If the maintainer wants a non-Octave coding style, this is what group
(tier) 2) is for.

It seems to me that some packages in the "community" group (interval, symbolic, perhaps others ?) use a Matlab-compatible coding style.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]