|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | Re: Help trying to merge my changes to current default |
Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:44:32 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
On 03/20/2018 11:19 AM, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
It's hard to say for sure without seeing exactly what you've done.
Ok, attached is my messy committing: a) I mention a local bookmark (refactor_pkg), b) I mention upstream, c) there are many local merges (the repo was moving quite fast in octconf) I think this adds too much noise tot he log, so I was trying to find out the best way to do it. Since rebase is an extension (I am not confident), I might go for the re-cloning. Is there an objection to that?
I use rebase often. If you are really worried that it will fail, work on a separate clone where it won't matter if you make some mistakes.
Another useful extension is "glog" for displaying a graphical representation of parent commits so you can see more clearly the relationship of changesets, similar to the display here:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/graph/4f1da669b610 jwe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |