[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Paparazzi-devel] Re: ArduIMU

From: Gautier Hattenberger
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Paparazzi-devel] Re: ArduIMU
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:33:15 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7

I can compile the code with tuning_basic_ins.xml for the arduIMU and even the VN100. The reference to ahrs should not be a problem.
In any case, these tuning files should be split with the general settings, the control and the ahrs/ins/ir/whatever clearly separated. We have the multiple selection for this purpose. It will break some configurations, but we need to do it and remove old settings files.


On 08/02/2011 12:49, Stephen L Hulme wrote:
Hi Paul
Not sure what the reference to Kurtis Kraemar is about - he seemed interested in video capture cards.
Nevertheless, the conf/settings/tuning_ins.xml and conf/settings/tuning_basic_ins.xml (previously tuning_ardu.xml) have a reference to the module subsystems/ahrs in the control section which causes compile errors.
These are paparazzi related code issues not the firmware code to be flashed onto Arduimu - which is what is causing the interest you allude to.
These paparazzi settings files worked well up until recently.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:28:38 +0100, Paul Cox wrote.
Just a practical suggestion concerning the recent mail list offer for imu code which everyone and their cousin has been responding to. It might be generally more useful (and would cut down on mail list traffic) if whoever has this preliminary IMU code would please check it in (somewhere like /in_progress or some sandboxy place like that). That way if anyone is interested they can simply take a look.
_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]