Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] HEAD todos - Survey

[Sigurd Nes]

1) and 2)
I have been using the current HEAD as a production platform for the
property app for the last 8 months - and I am very happy with it.

3)
I have had a quick look at the new framework - I think it would be a
good idea to port the app 'notes' to the new framework as an example.

4)
It looks promising - but it depends on how much work it would imply to 
port my app 'property' from HEAD

Sigurd

Dan Kuykendall wrote:

> Couple of questions:
>
> 1) What timeframe is expected for all of this?
>
> 2) Which developers are actually committed to pushing forward on the 
> HEAD code?
>
> 3) Which of them has looked at the new framework that jengo and I have 
> been working on?
>
> 4) What is the intrest level of the new framework?
>
> Dan
>
> Kai Hofmann wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > on the devcon we found the following steps that should be done on the 
> > head:
> >
> > - merging new 0.9.16 features into head
> > - fix the forced preferences problem
> > - making all applications/api code using the logging framework 
> > instead of
> > their logging/debugging mechanisms
> > - fix the database reserved keywords problems (see my other mailings 
> > about
> > this topic)
> > - use xml for the gui
> > - update the gui style guide where required
> > - make everything compatible with the gui style guide
> > - maybe improve the gui handling for the preferences (hide advanced 
> > options
> > for beginners, and expand them on request)
> > - read user preferences from the database on login and store them 
> > into the
> > session (usefull for demo-site)
> >   only for prefs where it is useful, like language setting.
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> >    Kai