Re: [PATCH] Setter methods for names/types of a struct type

[Konstantinos Chasialis]

I won't forget to CC the list again I promise :D.

> I was referring to pk_alloc and pk_assert, not to the type builders.  I
> don't think we want to expose these two calls to the callers of libpoke.
>

Ok, I will remove them.


>This is a matter of personal preference, but `type' is perfectly ok for
>the main type being referred in the call.  In this case, the struc type.

>When two types are passed as arguments, like in
>pk_struct_type_set_ftype, the main subject type can still be `type' and
>the other `field_type' or something like that.

Noted, I will change them.

Do you want me to send a reply to this thread with the above changes?