qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] hw/intc/exynos4210: replace 'qemu_split_irq' in combi


From: Zongyuan Li
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] hw/intc/exynos4210: replace 'qemu_split_irq' in combiner and gic
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 10:28:35 +0800

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 9:35 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 at 18:16, Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/arm/exynos4210.c           | 26 +++++++++++
> >  hw/intc/exynos4210_combiner.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  hw/intc/exynos4210_gic.c      | 36 +++++++++++++---
> >  include/hw/arm/exynos4210.h   | 11 ++---
> >  include/hw/core/split-irq.h   |  5 +--
> >  5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> Looking at this patch, I think it's ended up quite complicated
> because the exynos4210 code as it stands today is doing
> some rather odd things with interrupts. I'm going to have a
> go at some refactoring patches which try to clean some of that
> oddness up into code more like what we'd write today, which
> should make getting rid of the use of qemu_split_irq() a bit easier.

Should we wait for the refactoring to be done and rebase this patch set on it,
or just remove exynos4210 related code? I'm glad to see if there's anything I
can help with the refactoring.

Thanks for your review.
Li



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]