qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 3/7] qcow2: Check L1 table parameters in qcow2_e


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 3/7] qcow2: Check L1 table parameters in qcow2_expand_zero_clusters()
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:11:17 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

Am 06.03.2018 um 16:01 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> On Tue 06 Mar 2018 03:54:26 PM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> @@ -2092,11 +2092,18 @@ int qcow2_expand_zero_clusters(BlockDriverState 
> >> *bs,
> >>      }
> >>  
> >>      for (i = 0; i < s->nb_snapshots; i++) {
> >> -        int l1_sectors = DIV_ROUND_UP(s->snapshots[i].l1_size *
> >> -                                      sizeof(uint64_t), BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> >> +        int l1_size2;
> >> +        uint64_t *new_l1_table;
> >>  
> >> -        uint64_t *new_l1_table =
> >> -            g_try_realloc(l1_table, l1_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> >> +        ret = qcow2_validate_table(bs, s->snapshots[i].l1_table_offset,
> >> +                                   s->snapshots[i].l1_size, 
> >> sizeof(uint64_t),
> >> +                                   QCOW_MAX_L1_SIZE, "", NULL);
> >> +        if (ret < 0) {
> >> +            return ret;
> >
> > Shouldn't this be goto fail?
> 
> You're right, this is a loop, and l1_table could have been initialized
> in previous iterations.
> 
> I'll send a corrected version with this change, but first I'll wait a
> bit in case you see anything else in the series.

I've finished the review now, the rest looks correct.

The only other thing I wondered is about the cases where you pass a
NULL errp because the callers don't get an Error parameter, so they
can't pass it on. Some of these callers already use error_report(), so
it would be okay to use error_report_err() for an error returned by
qcow2_validate_table(), too. I think that would improve the messages.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]