[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X
From: |
André Braga |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:13:21 -0300 |
Still, there are the graphic routines (which are *painfully slow* when
it goes to VESA mode; console is rather zippy!) and I'm positive the
compiler can optimize FP instructions with SSE or something and/or
reorder/reschedule/etc the instructions in order to ameliorate cache
hits and whatnot.
I still believe it's not a complete waste of time.
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 22:56:30 +0200, Fabrice Bellard <address@hidden> wrote:
> Don't spend your time in using another compiler than gcc : most of the
> time is spent in the generated code, and the quality of this code relies
> on very small functions which are too simple for being optimized better.
>
> Fabrice.
>
--
"A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God"
Alan J. Perlis
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Joshua Root, 2004/08/04
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Ben Pfaff, 2004/08/04
- RE: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Roine Gustafsson, 2004/08/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/08/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X,
André Braga <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/08/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, André Braga, 2004/08/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Lindsay Mathieson, 2004/08/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Laurent Amon, 2004/08/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, André Braga, 2004/08/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Joshua Root, 2004/08/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, Joe Batt, 2004/08/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Performances on Mac OS X, dguinan, 2004/08/15