|
From: | Avi Kivity |
Subject: | [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 |
Date: | Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:41:17 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 03/08/2011 07:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a >>> regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? >> >> Can't follow. What do you mean? >> I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test > definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread.> What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm.That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes? I wasn't talking about that in the call.
Of course, this is an important issue in its own right. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |