[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] introduce libcacard/vscard_common.h
From: |
Alon Levy |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] introduce libcacard/vscard_common.h |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:52:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:01:19PM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 02/23/11 12:20, Alon Levy wrote:
> > diff --git a/libcacard/vscard_common.h b/libcacard/vscard_common.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..7449314
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/libcacard/vscard_common.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
> > +/* Virtual Smart Card protocol definition
> > + *
> > + * This protocol is between a host using virtual smart card readers,
> > + * and a client providing the smart cards, perhaps by emulating them or by
> > + * access to real cards.
> > + *
> > + * Definitions for this protocol:
> > + * Host - user of the card
> > + * Client - owner of the card
> > + *
> > + * The current implementation passes the raw APDU's from 7816 and
> > additionally
> > + * contains messages to setup and teardown readers, handle insertion and
> > + * removal of cards, negotiate the protocol via capabilities and provide
> > + * for error responses.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2011 Red Hat.
> > + *
> > + * This code is licensed under the LGPL.
>
> Please be more specific on the license. Other code has the following:
> * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.1 or
> later.
> * See the COPYING.LIB file in the top-level directory.
>
> [snip]
> > +/* VSCMsgInit Client <-> Host
> > + * Client sends it on connection, with its own capabilities.
> > + * Host replies with VSCMsgInit filling in its capabilities.
> > + *
> > + * It is not meant to be used for negotiation, i.e. sending more then
> > + * once from any side, but could be used for that in the future.
> > + * */
>
> Looks like some automatic mangling of comments - happens in more than
> one place.
What, the repeated "capabilities" word at the end of two consecutive lines?
that's on purpose.
>
> Except for the cosmetic stuff, looks ok.
>
> Jes
>
>