Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/26] Implement the bus structure for PAPR virtual IO

[David Gibson]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 05:04:43PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 11:56 PM, David Gibson wrote:
[snip]
> >+static int spapr_vio_busdev_init(DeviceState *dev, DeviceInfo *info)
> >+{
> >+    VIOsPAPRDeviceInfo *_info = (VIOsPAPRDeviceInfo *)info;
> >+    VIOsPAPRDevice *_dev = (VIOsPAPRDevice *)dev;
> >+    char *id;
> >+
> >+    if (asprintf(&id, "address@hidden", _info->dt_name, _dev->reg)<  0) {
> >+        return -1;
> >+    }
> >+
> >+    _dev->qdev.id = id;
> >+
> >+    return _info->init(_dev);
> 
> The C standard actually reserves the _ and __ namespaces for
> compilers and system headers.  The kernel can get away with it
> because it doesn't use system headers but we've had trouble with
> this in QEMU.

Ok, I was just following the example of the s390 code here.
Nonetheless I've changed it.

[snip]
> >+        if (info->hcalls)
> >+            info->hcalls(bus);
> 
> Got a little sloppy with braces here..

Not so much sloppy as just very, very used to the kernel style.

[snip]
> We have a checkpatch.pl in the tree.  I'd suggest using that to get
> rid of the rest of the CODING_STYLE issues which I'll stop
> commenting on.

Yeah, believe it or not I did already fix up a lot of these.  I
thought I'd got nearly all of them, but obviously not :(.  Either that
or I did get them and lost the changes in the git mishap I had a while
back.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson