[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM

From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Plan for moving forward with QOM
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:42:02 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 09/16/2011 01:22 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Then we are arguing about minor detail. But according to you this minor
detail will prevent us from walking device tree up to the root, so it is
not so minor for me.

There is no root. It's not a tree. The composition tree (which we've been talking about using for canonical pathnames) has nothing to do with the buses.

Moreover, the composition tree doesn't have a single root. It's got multiple root nodes (any user created device is a root node of a composition tree).


Anthony Liguori


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]