[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6 v4] target-tilegx: Firstly add to qemu with
Chen Gang S
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6 v4] target-tilegx: Firstly add to qemu with minimized features
Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:10:15 +0800
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
On 2/28/15 05:49, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/27/2015 12:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> "TILE-Gx" according to
>> http://www.tilera.com/products/?ezchip=585&spage=614 - please fix
>> wherever used in textual form.
> Yes, really only "tilegx" or "TILE-Gx" should be used. In type names I agree
> that TileGX is probably clearer than any alternatives.
OK, thanks. I shall use TILE-Gx for it.
And next, for the type names, I shall use TileGX.
>> What about CPU models? Do the Gx72, Gx36, etc. differ only in core count
>> or also in instruction set features?
> From a userspace perspective, it's mostly the core count. They also have a
> different set of on-chip hardware accelerators, etc., but that's out of scope
> for this project.
OK, thanks. I guess your meaning is "For qemu, we needn't consider about
Gx72, Gx36 ..., we can treat all of them as TILE-Gx".
By the way, does Gx8000 mean 8000 core count?
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6 v4] linux-user: tilegx: Add target features support within qemu, Chen Gang S, 2015/02/22
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6 v4] linux-user: Support tilegx architecture in syscall, Chen Gang S, 2015/02/22
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6 v4] linux-user: Support tilegx architecture in linux-user, Chen Gang S, 2015/02/22