|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] cutils: Normalize qemu_strto[u]ll() signature |
Date: | Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:42:27 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
On 25/09/2015 14:39, Andreas Färber wrote: > Instead of using int64_t for qemu_strtoll() and uiint64_t for > qemu_strtoull(), use long long and unsigned long long as their name > implies. > > The only affected callers are our test cases. > > This prepares for following checkpatch's recommendation of using it more, > by making it easier to switch from POSIX to QEMU versions. > Remaining difference is const-ness. Do we actually use long long and unsigned long long anywhere? Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |