[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emu
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:54:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 |
On 06/17/2016 04:27 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:07:02AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:24:47AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> This reworks emulation of the various "rfi" variants. I removed
>>> some masking bits that I couldn't make sense of, the only bit that
>>> I am aware we should mask here is POW, the CPU's MSR mask should
>>> take care of the rest.
>>>
>>> This also fixes some problems when running 32-bit userspace under
>>> a 64-bit kernel.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
>>
>> I've merged this patch to ppc-for-2.7.
>
> ..and now I've removed it again. It seems that this breaks Thomas'
> new test that OpenBIOS runs on the mac machine types. Not sure why,
> but we need to figure that out before I apply.
Just this patch ? I booted a macosx image with it. but maybe just a mac99.
I will check today.
C.
>> The reset of the series I'd like to see a respin for, even if it's
>> just to clean up the commit messages.
>>
>>> ---
>>> target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 51
>>> +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>> target-ppc/translate.c | 7 +++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
>>> index 30e960e30b63..aa0b63f4b0de 100644
>>> --- a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
>>> +++ b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
>>> @@ -922,25 +922,20 @@ void helper_store_msr(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong
>>> val)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong nip, target_ulong
>>> msr,
>>> - target_ulong msrm, int keep_msrh)
>>> +static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong nip, target_ulong
>>> msr)
>>> {
>>> CPUState *cs = CPU(ppc_env_get_cpu(env));
>>>
>>> + /* MSR:POW cannot be set by any form of rfi */
>>> + msr &= ~(1ULL << MSR_POW);
>>> +
>>> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
>>> - if (msr_is_64bit(env, msr)) {
>>> - nip = (uint64_t)nip;
>>> - msr &= (uint64_t)msrm;
>>> - } else {
>>> + /* Switching to 32-bit ? Crop the nip */
>>> + if (!msr_is_64bit(env, msr)) {
>>> nip = (uint32_t)nip;
>>> - msr = (uint32_t)(msr & msrm);
>>> - if (keep_msrh) {
>>> - msr |= env->msr & ~((uint64_t)0xFFFFFFFF);
>>> - }
>>> }
>>> #else
>>> nip = (uint32_t)nip;
>>> - msr &= (uint32_t)msrm;
>>> #endif
>>> /* XXX: beware: this is false if VLE is supported */
>>> env->nip = nip & ~((target_ulong)0x00000003);
>>> @@ -959,26 +954,24 @@ static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env,
>>> target_ulong nip, target_ulong msr,
>>>
>>> void helper_rfi(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> {
>>> - if (env->excp_model == POWERPC_EXCP_BOOKE) {
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
>>> - ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
>>> - } else {
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
>>> - ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 1);
>>> - }
>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1] & 0xfffffffful);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#define MSR_BOOK3S_MASK
>>> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
>>> void helper_rfid(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> {
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
>>> - ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 0);
>>> + /* The architeture defines a number of rules for which bits
>>> + * can change but in practice, we handle this in hreg_store_msr()
>>> + * which will be called by do_rfi(), so there is no need to filter
>>> + * here
>>> + */
>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void helper_hrfid(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> {
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_HSRR0], env->spr[SPR_HSRR1],
>>> - ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 0);
>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_HSRR0], env->spr[SPR_HSRR1]);
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> @@ -986,28 +979,24 @@ void helper_hrfid(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> /* Embedded PowerPC specific helpers */
>>> void helper_40x_rfci(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> {
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR2], env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR3],
>>> - ~((target_ulong)0xFFFF0000), 0);
>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR2], env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR3]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void helper_rfci(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> {
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR1],
>>> - ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR1]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void helper_rfdi(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> {
>>> /* FIXME: choose CSRR1 or DSRR1 based on cpu type */
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR1],
>>> - ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR1]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void helper_rfmci(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> {
>>> /* FIXME: choose CSRR1 or MCSRR1 based on cpu type */
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR1],
>>> - ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR1]);
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> @@ -1045,7 +1034,7 @@ void helper_td(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong arg1,
>>> target_ulong arg2,
>>>
>>> void helper_rfsvc(CPUPPCState *env)
>>> {
>>> - do_rfi(env, env->lr, env->ctr, 0x0000FFFF, 0);
>>> + do_rfi(env, env->lr, env->ctr & 0x0000FFFF);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Embedded.Processor Control */
>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
>>> index b6894751e8df..a02ddf52bfe6 100644
>>> --- a/target-ppc/translate.c
>>> +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
>>> @@ -4087,6 +4087,13 @@ static void gen_rfi(DisasContext *ctx)
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>>> gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_PRIV_OPC);
>>> #else
>>> + /* This instruction doesn't exist anymore on 64-bit server
>>> + * processors compliant with arch 2.x
>>> + */
>>> + if (ctx->insns_flags & PPC_SEGMENT_64B) {
>>> + gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_INVAL);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> /* Restore CPU state */
>>> if (unlikely(ctx->pr)) {
>>> gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_PRIV_OPC);
>>
>
>
>
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] rework exception model to support the HV mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, David Gibson, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Thomas Huth, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Thomas Huth, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Alexander Graf, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, 2016/06/18