[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emu
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:03:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 |
On 06/17/2016 07:54 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 06/17/2016 04:27 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:07:02AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:24:47AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>>>
>>>> This reworks emulation of the various "rfi" variants. I removed
>>>> some masking bits that I couldn't make sense of, the only bit that
>>>> I am aware we should mask here is POW, the CPU's MSR mask should
>>>> take care of the rest.
>>>>
>>>> This also fixes some problems when running 32-bit userspace under
>>>> a 64-bit kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>>> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> I've merged this patch to ppc-for-2.7.
>>
>> ..and now I've removed it again. It seems that this breaks Thomas'
>> new test that OpenBIOS runs on the mac machine types. Not sure why,
>> but we need to figure that out before I apply.
>
> Just this patch ? I booted a macosx image with it. but maybe just a mac99.
> I will check today.
With your branch ppc-for-2.7 (at commit aba2e6258d86) + the
"ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation" patch, these guests :
qemu-system-ppc -cdrom ./darwinppc-602.cdr -boot d
qemu-system-ppc -M mac99 -cdrom ./darwinppc-602.cdr -boot d
reach the installer macosx installer.
C.
>>> The reset of the series I'd like to see a respin for, even if it's
>>> just to clean up the commit messages.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> target-ppc/excp_helper.c | 51
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>>> target-ppc/translate.c | 7 +++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
>>>> index 30e960e30b63..aa0b63f4b0de 100644
>>>> --- a/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
>>>> +++ b/target-ppc/excp_helper.c
>>>> @@ -922,25 +922,20 @@ void helper_store_msr(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong
>>>> val)
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong nip,
>>>> target_ulong msr,
>>>> - target_ulong msrm, int keep_msrh)
>>>> +static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong nip,
>>>> target_ulong msr)
>>>> {
>>>> CPUState *cs = CPU(ppc_env_get_cpu(env));
>>>>
>>>> + /* MSR:POW cannot be set by any form of rfi */
>>>> + msr &= ~(1ULL << MSR_POW);
>>>> +
>>>> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
>>>> - if (msr_is_64bit(env, msr)) {
>>>> - nip = (uint64_t)nip;
>>>> - msr &= (uint64_t)msrm;
>>>> - } else {
>>>> + /* Switching to 32-bit ? Crop the nip */
>>>> + if (!msr_is_64bit(env, msr)) {
>>>> nip = (uint32_t)nip;
>>>> - msr = (uint32_t)(msr & msrm);
>>>> - if (keep_msrh) {
>>>> - msr |= env->msr & ~((uint64_t)0xFFFFFFFF);
>>>> - }
>>>> }
>>>> #else
>>>> nip = (uint32_t)nip;
>>>> - msr &= (uint32_t)msrm;
>>>> #endif
>>>> /* XXX: beware: this is false if VLE is supported */
>>>> env->nip = nip & ~((target_ulong)0x00000003);
>>>> @@ -959,26 +954,24 @@ static inline void do_rfi(CPUPPCState *env,
>>>> target_ulong nip, target_ulong msr,
>>>>
>>>> void helper_rfi(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> - if (env->excp_model == POWERPC_EXCP_BOOKE) {
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
>>>> - ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
>>>> - } else {
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
>>>> - ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 1);
>>>> - }
>>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1] & 0xfffffffful);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +#define MSR_BOOK3S_MASK
>>>> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
>>>> void helper_rfid(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1],
>>>> - ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 0);
>>>> + /* The architeture defines a number of rules for which bits
>>>> + * can change but in practice, we handle this in hreg_store_msr()
>>>> + * which will be called by do_rfi(), so there is no need to filter
>>>> + * here
>>>> + */
>>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_SRR0], env->spr[SPR_SRR1]);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void helper_hrfid(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_HSRR0], env->spr[SPR_HSRR1],
>>>> - ~((target_ulong)0x783F0000), 0);
>>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_HSRR0], env->spr[SPR_HSRR1]);
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> @@ -986,28 +979,24 @@ void helper_hrfid(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> /* Embedded PowerPC specific helpers */
>>>> void helper_40x_rfci(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR2], env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR3],
>>>> - ~((target_ulong)0xFFFF0000), 0);
>>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR2], env->spr[SPR_40x_SRR3]);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void helper_rfci(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR1],
>>>> - ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
>>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_CSRR1]);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void helper_rfdi(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> /* FIXME: choose CSRR1 or DSRR1 based on cpu type */
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR1],
>>>> - ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
>>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DSRR1]);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void helper_rfmci(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> /* FIXME: choose CSRR1 or MCSRR1 based on cpu type */
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR1],
>>>> - ~((target_ulong)0), 0);
>>>> + do_rfi(env, env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR0], env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_MCSRR1]);
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1045,7 +1034,7 @@ void helper_td(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong arg1,
>>>> target_ulong arg2,
>>>>
>>>> void helper_rfsvc(CPUPPCState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> - do_rfi(env, env->lr, env->ctr, 0x0000FFFF, 0);
>>>> + do_rfi(env, env->lr, env->ctr & 0x0000FFFF);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* Embedded.Processor Control */
>>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
>>>> index b6894751e8df..a02ddf52bfe6 100644
>>>> --- a/target-ppc/translate.c
>>>> +++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
>>>> @@ -4087,6 +4087,13 @@ static void gen_rfi(DisasContext *ctx)
>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>>>> gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_PRIV_OPC);
>>>> #else
>>>> + /* This instruction doesn't exist anymore on 64-bit server
>>>> + * processors compliant with arch 2.x
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (ctx->insns_flags & PPC_SEGMENT_64B) {
>>>> + gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_INVAL);
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> /* Restore CPU state */
>>>> if (unlikely(ctx->pr)) {
>>>> gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_PRIV_OPC);
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] rework exception model to support the HV mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, David Gibson, 2016/06/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Thomas Huth, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Thomas Huth, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Alexander Graf, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, 2016/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/19